Failure to Provide Restorative ROM and Mobility Services
Summary
The facility failed to provide restorative services to assist residents with mobility and/or limited range of motion to attain or maintain their highest level of functioning. Review of the facility policy showed that restorative nursing care was to be individualized, resident-centered, and used to help promote optimal safety and independence, including maintaining or strengthening physiological resources. During the survey, the Director of Therapy and the Director of Nursing stated that the facility did not have a restorative nursing program because of staffing issues, although both said residents would benefit from restorative nursing and ROM services. Resident #6 had cerebral palsy, was wheelchair dependent, and had severe spasticity with limited ROM of the arms and upper body. The resident required a mechanical lift for transfers and frequent monitoring of positioning. The resident stated that no therapy had been provided for a long time, that the muscle spasticity in the low back and legs was painful, and that a restorative program might help maintain upper body strength. The Director of Therapy said the resident would benefit from restorative nursing because of the cerebral palsy and spasticity, but also said the resident was not interested when approached about therapy. Resident #28 had osteoarthritis, used a walker and wheelchair, and had been independent with transfers and ambulation in the room, but was observed propelling a wheelchair and stopping several times to rest. The resident stated feeling weaker than on admission, said the resident used to walk farther with a walker, and wanted to work with therapy to get stronger again. Resident #30 had a stroke, severe cognitive impairment, was dependent for positioning and mobility, and was observed lying in bed with both hands and fingers clenched closed. The legal representative reported concern that the resident was not getting therapy and that the hands were getting worse, and said the resident would benefit from ROM even if unable to participate in therapy. The Director of Therapy stated that a resident with bilateral hand contractures would benefit from restorative nursing ROM and adaptive measures, but she had not evaluated the resident. Resident #3 had a hip fracture and had been placed in a restorative ROM program for bilateral lower extremities after skilled PT, with recommendations to continue restorative ROM per tolerance. However, the care plan contained no documentation regarding restorative nursing services, and the medical record showed no documentation of participation in a restorative ROM program. Resident #7 had severe cognitive impairment, functional ROM limitations in both upper and lower extremities, and was dependent for all ADLs and transfers. PT discharge documentation recommended referral to restorative nursing per resident tolerance, yet the resident was observed with a swollen right hand, curled fingers, and a right thumb nail digging into the index finger, and the resident was unable to independently hold the hand open. The DON stated the facility did not have a restorative nurse aide or a current restorative therapy program, and expected nursing staff to offer ROM in bed or during showers.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 29, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.