Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0837
D

Failure to Implement Effective Governing Body Communication and QAPI Involvement

Hagerstown, Maryland Survey Completed on 01-29-2026

Penalty

Fine: $21,665
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to establish and implement a process for communication between the administrator and the governing body, including the mode of communication, frequency, and content of what was to be communicated. Review of the Governing Body Policy and Procedure showed no implementation date and stated that governing body members were to be active, engaged, involved in facility affairs, have direct access to the administrator and compliance officer through executive board sessions, and be involved in the QAPI program. A letter designated the administrator as the Compliance and Ethics Officer and identified the DON, social worker, and medical director as members of the Compliance and Ethics Committee. However, review of QAPI meeting sign-in sheets showed no evidence that any governing body member attended these meetings. In an interview, the NHA stated she was not aware of a policy regarding governing body involvement with the facility, reported that governing body members had not attended QAPI meetings, and acknowledged she had not contacted them since her return to the facility.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙