Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0585
D

Failure to Adequately Investigate and Resolve Resident Grievances About Incontinence Care

Laplata, Maryland Survey Completed on 01-09-2026

Penalty

Fine: $17,215
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to adequately address and resolve a resident’s grievances related to incontinence care and other concerns. Record review showed that on 12/9/25 three concerns about Resident #10 were reported to social services: the resident’s incontinence briefs were leaking more than previous ones and their clothing smelled of urine more frequently, two medical shoe boots were missing, and construction odors were bothering the resident. The grievance form indicated that the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) investigated the grievance and signed it as resolved on 12/10/25, but the written response did not address the concern about the leaking incontinence briefs. A second grievance dated 12/24/25, completed by Unit Manager #4, documented that the same resident again reported leaking incontinence briefs that caused urine odor on their clothing and led them to miss a facility event. The resident stated that the previous briefs did not leak and that they had been complaining without anyone listening. The follow-up section stated that the current brief was not new and that a pad would be added under the brief, and it was marked as resolved. However, there was no documented investigation into why the briefs were leaking or what intervention would prevent recurrence. During an interview, the resident reported ongoing feelings that staff were not responsive to their grievances. In a separate interview, the NHA, who served as Grievance Officer, acknowledged that the incontinence brief concern was not addressed when first reported and that the second grievance was not investigated to ensure an effective resolution for the resident.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙