Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0725
E

Delayed Call Light Response and Inadequate Nursing Staff Responsiveness

Oakland, Iowa Survey Completed on 01-08-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Surveyors identified a deficiency related to inadequate nursing staff response to resident call lights, resulting in delays beyond the facility’s own expectation of a 15-minute response time. One resident with a BIMS score of 15 and documented as always incontinent of urine and bowels reported that it frequently took longer than 15 minutes for staff to answer call lights, occurring on both shifts. Continuous observation by surveyors showed a call light in the East hallway remained unanswered for 16 minutes. Another resident, also cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15 and diagnoses including renal insufficiency, neurogenic bladder, and paraplegia, reported having his call light on while waiting to lie down and stated he had been waiting about 20 minutes, noting that such delays occurred from time to time. During a resident council meeting with multiple residents, participants reported that call lights could take longer than 15 minutes to be answered, particularly at most shift changes. The DON stated her expectation was that call lights be answered within 15 minutes or less. Review of the facility’s policy on call lights indicated that all staff members who see or hear an activated call light are responsible for responding. Despite this policy and stated expectations, surveyor observations, resident interviews, and documentation review showed that call lights were not consistently answered in a timely manner, contributing to the identified deficiency in providing adequate nursing staff response to meet residents’ needs.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙