Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0700
D

Failure to Assess and Document Alternatives Prior to Bed Rail Use

Rexburg, Idaho Survey Completed on 01-09-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to follow its own bed rail policy requiring that appropriate alternatives be attempted and evaluated before installing bed rails, and that residents or their representatives be provided sufficient information to make an informed decision. The policy, revised in August 2017, states that alternatives must be tried prior to installing side or bed rails and that, if rails are used, the facility must ensure correct installation, use, and maintenance. The policy also requires documentation of the assessed medical needs addressed by bed rails, the expected benefits and likelihood of those benefits, the risks and how they will be mitigated, and the alternatives attempted that failed or were considered inappropriate. For one resident reviewed for bed rails, the facility did not document that these requirements were met. The resident was admitted with multiple diagnoses, including acute respiratory failure with hypercapnia, schizoaffective disorder, and AFib. During observation, the resident was noted to have bilateral upper side rails in use. However, the medical record lacked documentation of any evaluation of alternatives attempted, any explanation of how those alternatives failed to meet the resident’s needs, and any documentation of the purpose or intended use of the side rails. In an interview, the DON confirmed that the resident did not have a side rail assessment completed and acknowledged that such an assessment should have been done.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙