Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0840
D

Failure to Obtain Ordered Cardiology Consultation for Pacemaker Patient

Orlando, Florida Survey Completed on 12-23-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that ordered cardiology services were provided for a male resident with multiple cardiac conditions, including atherosclerotic heart disease, chronic atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, and the presence of a pacemaker. The resident was admitted from another nursing home and later readmitted from an acute care hospital, with active physician orders that included Eliquis for atrial fibrillation, Lasix for edema and CHF, Toprol for hypertension, compression stockings, and a cardiology consultation. The resident’s MDS showed moderate cognitive impairment and dependence on staff for all ADLs, and he was receiving high‑risk anticoagulant, diuretic, and antiplatelet medications. During observation, the resident was seen in a reclining wheelchair with both lower legs visibly discolored red/dark red and swollen. Record review and staff interviews revealed that a physician’s order for a cardiology consultation had been in place since 9/18/25, but no cardiology provider notes or evidence of a completed consult were found in the medical record. The Interim DON stated she was unaware of the status of the consult and confirmed the resident, who had a pacemaker, should have had a cardiology consult shortly after the order was written. The Nurse Scheduler, who was responsible for arranging outside specialist appointments, acknowledged that the cardiology consult order had not been completed and stated it had “fell by the wayside.” She reported that she had assumed a prior vascular appointment meant a cardiology consult was not needed and later learned from the cardiology provider that the resident’s last cardiology visit had been more than a year earlier. The facility’s own assessment tool indicated it provided nursing services to manage residents with chronic cardiac conditions, yet the ordered cardiology consultation for this resident was not obtained for over three months.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙