Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
D

Failure to Implement Fall Prevention Interventions and Obtain Required Physician Orders

Euless, Texas Survey Completed on 12-12-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a resident identified as a fall risk was provided with adequate accident prevention measures as outlined in his care plan. Specifically, the resident, who had severe cognitive impairment, muscle weakness, and required extensive assistance with activities of daily living, did not have a physician order for the scoop mattress used on his bed. Additionally, the fall mat, which was an intervention listed in his care plan to prevent injury from falls, was observed leaning against the wall rather than being placed alongside the bed while the resident was in it. Interviews with nursing staff, including an RN, the DON, and the ADON, confirmed that the fall mat should have been positioned next to the resident's bed whenever he was lying in it, and that a physician order was required for the scoop mattress. The facility's policy on physical restraints also indicated that such devices should only be used with appropriate medical justification and orders. The lack of proper placement of the fall mat and absence of a physician order for the scoop mattress constituted a failure to provide an environment free from accident hazards and to implement necessary interventions for accident prevention as specified in the resident's care plan.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙