Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
E

Failure to Respond to Elopement Alarm Results in Resident Leaving Facility

Fresno, California Survey Completed on 11-04-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when staff failed to respond promptly to a security elopement alarm, resulting in a resident eloping from the facility. The resident had been admitted with acute encephalopathy, severe impairment affecting judgment, and a history of wandering and elopement. Assessments indicated the resident was independently mobile, at high risk for both elopement and falls, and had a physician's order for a security bracelet to be worn on the right ankle. The care plan included interventions such as applying the security bracelet and checking its function and placement per protocol. On the day of the incident, the resident was last seen by staff outside his room during breakfast service. When the resident could not be located, a search was initiated inside and outside the facility. The security bracelet alarm at the front door was triggered, but staff did not respond to the alarm in a timely manner. The resident was eventually found at a family member's home approximately one mile away and was returned to the facility. At the time of his return, the security bracelet was still in place and functioning. Interviews with facility leadership confirmed that the alarm at the front door was sounding but was not answered immediately, as the receptionist who typically monitors the area was not on duty at the time. The facility had six other residents identified as high risk for elopement, all with physician's orders for security bracelets due to wandering or exit-seeking behaviors. Facility policies required adequate supervision and timely response to alarms for residents at risk of elopement, but these protocols were not followed during the incident.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙