Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0627
D

Failure to Follow Transfer/Discharge Policy and Court Order for Resident Readmission

Oakhurst, California Survey Completed on 12-02-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to follow its transfer and discharge policy and procedure for a resident who was admitted with multiple complex medical conditions, including cervical spine fusion, functional quadriplegia, inflammatory spondylopathy, chronic pain syndrome, and cervical spinal stenosis. The resident was cognitively intact, as indicated by a perfect score on the Brief Interview for Mental Status. Despite a court order requiring the facility to readmit the resident after a hospitalization, the facility did not comply and refused readmission. The facility did not provide the required written notice to the resident regarding the transfer or discharge, nor did it document a legally permissible reason for the discharge in the medical record. The facility also failed to develop and implement an effective discharge planning process that focused on the resident's discharge goals. Interviews with facility staff revealed that although preparations were made for the resident's return, concerns about the resident's behavior led to a decision not to readmit, despite the court order and the resident's expressed preference to return. Documentation from the hospital indicated that the resident was ultimately discharged to another skilled nursing facility after the family was unable to provide care at home. The facility's own policy required that residents be permitted to return after hospitalization unless a proper discharge process was followed, including timely notice and coordination with the resident and their representative. In this case, the facility did not meet these requirements, resulting in the resident being transferred without proper notice or planning.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙