Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0692
D

Failure to Monitor and Address Significant Weight Loss

Milwaukee, Wisconsin Survey Completed on 12-04-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a resident maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status, specifically regarding significant weight loss. The resident, who had multiple diagnoses including severe protein calorie malnutrition, chronic kidney disease, and legal blindness, experienced a weight loss of 10.1 pounds (6.61%) over three weeks. Despite facility policy requiring notification of the physician or registered dietician (RD) for significant weight changes, there was no evidence that either was notified or that new nutritional interventions were implemented. The resident's care plan identified them as at risk for impaired nutrition, and assessments indicated malnutrition and ongoing weight concerns, but no follow-up documentation or recommendations from the RD were found after the initial assessment. Additionally, the facility failed to maintain adequate documentation of the resident's meal intake, with over half of the meals served lacking any record of consumption. This lack of documentation made it impossible to accurately assess the resident's nutritional intake in relation to the observed weight loss. The surveyor confirmed these findings with facility leadership, who acknowledged the gaps in documentation and monitoring but did not provide further information prior to the survey exit.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙