Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0604
D

Failure to Obtain Required Evaluation and Orders for Physical Restraints

Vancouver, Washington Survey Completed on 11-21-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to obtain a Safety Device Evaluation and Consent and/or physician's order for two residents who were using physical restraints, as required by facility policy. For one resident with severe cognitive impairment, the bed was observed in a low position multiple times, but there was no documentation of a Safety Device Evaluation, physician's order, or care plan intervention related to this practice. Staff confirmed that such documentation and orders were required but not present in the resident's electronic health record or care plan. For another resident with moderate cognitive impairment, the bed was observed placed against the wall on several occasions, but again, there was no Safety Device Evaluation, physician's order, or care plan intervention documented. Staff interviews revealed that the bed was moved against the wall at the resident's request to prevent rolling out, but staff were unaware of the need for evaluation and documentation. The Director of Nursing confirmed that it was expected for evaluations, consents, and physician's orders to be in place for beds in low positions or against the wall, but these were not completed for the residents involved.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙