Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0657
D

Failure to Review and Revise Care Plans After Resident Altercations

Richmond, Virginia Survey Completed on 12-17-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Facility staff failed to review and/or revise care plans for two residents following resident-to-resident altercations. In the first instance, a resident with a history of traumatic brain injury, cognitive impairment, restlessness, agitation, mood disorder, and physical aggression was involved in an altercation where he punched another resident in the face. The incident resulted in the aggressor being placed on 1:1 supervision and the victim sustaining abrasions and undergoing neurochecks. Despite these events, there was no evidence that the care plan interventions for the aggressor were reviewed for effectiveness or revised after the incident. In the second case, another resident with dementia and a history of hoarding and physical aggression struck a peer in the chest as the peer attempted to pass by in a common area. Staff immediately separated the residents and placed the aggressor on 1:1 supervision. However, the care plan for this resident, which already noted aggressive behaviors, was not reviewed or updated following the altercation. Interviews with LPNs and a unit manager confirmed that care plans are intended to guide staff in meeting residents' needs and should be reviewed and updated after incidents such as physical altercations. Facility policy also requires care plans to be updated as changes occur and reviewed quarterly. Despite these requirements, there was no documentation of care plan review or revision for either resident following their respective incidents.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙