Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0658
D

Failure to Follow PICC Line Assessment and Documentation Standards

Brattleboro, Vermont Survey Completed on 09-17-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to follow professional standards of practice regarding the care and maintenance of a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line for a resident with acute osteomyelitis and a chronic foot ulcer who was receiving intravenous antibiotics. During an observation, an LPN encountered resistance while attempting to administer an antibiotic through the resident's PICC line. The line was found to be excessively long and coiled, causing it to kink under the dressing and impede fluid flow. Upon uncoiling, the line measured 42 cm at the indicator, suggesting possible migration of the catheter. Record review revealed that there was no documentation of the external catheter length at the insertion site upon admission or during subsequent weekly assessments, as required by facility policy. The Assistant Director of Nursing confirmed that the line should have been measured at admission and weekly thereafter, but no such measurements were documented in the medical record. This lack of assessment and documentation meant there was no evidence to determine whether the line had migrated or if it was safe to use.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙