Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
D

Failure to Implement Elopement Prevention Measures for At-Risk Resident

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Survey Completed on 05-15-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide adequate supervision and maintain an environment free of potential hazards for a resident identified as being at risk for elopement. According to facility documentation, the resident was able to break a window block, kick out the screen, and exit through a first-floor window without injury. The resident subsequently left the premises and was later found at his family home by police, who returned him to the facility. The resident's care plan identified him as an elopement risk and included interventions such as staff checking on his whereabouts throughout the shift and placing his picture at the receptionist desk. Upon review, it was observed that the required photograph of the resident was not present at the reception area, as specified in both the facility's elopement policy and the resident's care plan. Staff interviews confirmed that this intervention was not implemented following the resident's elopement. The failure to follow established policies and care plan interventions contributed to the resident's ability to leave the facility unsupervised.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙