Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
J

Elopement Due to Inadequate Supervision

Uniontown, Pennsylvania Survey Completed on 08-20-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when a resident with a history of cerebral infarction, high blood pressure, and difficulty walking eloped from the facility without staff knowledge or supervision. The resident was assessed as cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15 and had a care plan in place identifying a risk for wandering or elopement. Despite this, staff did not provide adequate supervision, and the resident was able to leave the facility undetected for approximately 22 hours before being located by police. Multiple staff members observed the resident throughout the evening, noting that he was frequently walking in the hallways and was last seen between 8:00 and 9:00 p.m. Staff relied on assumptions about the resident's whereabouts, with some believing he was in the dining room or elsewhere in the building, and did not verify his location during rounds. The facility's practice was to conduct two-hour checks only on incontinent residents, and staff admitted to bypassing the resident's room during rounds due to his usual activity of walking around the facility. The facility was unaware of how or when the resident exited the building, and it was noted that door codes may have been accessible to residents. The lack of consistent supervision and failure to account for the resident's whereabouts resulted in a delay in recognizing his absence. The deficiency was confirmed by the facility's administration, who acknowledged that staff should have realized the resident was missing sooner.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙