Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0583
D

Failure to Provide Private Environment for Consensual Intimacy

Myrtle Point, Oregon Survey Completed on 12-08-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide a private environment for physical intimacy for two residents who were both determined to have the capacity and desire to engage in consensual sexual activity. One resident, admitted with chronic lung disease and moderate cognitive impairment, and another resident, admitted with heart disease and cognitively intact, were observed engaging in intimate acts in public areas both outside and inside the building. Staff documented incidents where the residents were seen with hands inside each other's clothing in non-private settings. Despite both residents being evaluated and found capable of consenting to sexual activity, interviews revealed that the facility did not provide a designated private space for residents to meet for intimacy. One resident reported that while meetings with the other resident were allowed, they were always chaperoned and no private area was made available. Facility staff confirmed that there was no location within the facility designated for private, consensual intimate encounters between residents.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙