Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0690
D

Failure to Provide Physician-Ordered External Urinary Catheter System

North Ridgeville, Ohio Survey Completed on 12-17-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide an external urinary catheter system for a resident with a physician order for its use. The resident, who had diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and dementia, was frequently incontinent of bladder and always incontinent of bowel, and required substantial assistance for transfers and toileting. Despite a physician order for an external urinary catheter to be applied nightly, the resident's care plan did not include this intervention, and the system was not implemented during the resident's stay. Documentation showed that the resident and her representative had requested the external catheter, and a urology consult recommended its use to reduce skin breakdown and infection. However, facility staff, including the DON and Administrator, stated that the external catheter system was not allowed, citing facility policy, although no such policy was documented or provided to the resident or her representative. Interviews with the resident confirmed that she had previously used an external urinary catheter at home and would have preferred to continue its use in the facility, but agreed to regular check and change care only because the external catheter was not permitted. The facility's admission agreement and information packet did not inform residents that external urinary catheters were not allowed. The lack of implementation of the physician-ordered external urinary catheter system, absence of related interventions in the care plan, and lack of clear facility policy or communication regarding the prohibition of the device led to the deficiency.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙