Improper Catheter Maintenance and Delayed Follow-Up of Urology Recommendations
Summary
The facility failed to properly and safely maintain urinary catheters and to timely address urology recommendations for one resident’s suprapubic catheter, affecting two residents reviewed for catheter care. Resident #60 had diagnoses including urinary retention, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, and cognitive impairment, and was dependent on staff for all ADLs. The record showed a long history of catheter problems, including failed voiding trials, repeated catheter replacements, and hospital visits for catheter displacement and malfunction. The care plan identified a Foley catheter, but also described the catheter as a Coude catheter without a corresponding order or size documented in the care plan. For Resident #60, hospital and urology records documented repeated catheter-related events. The resident was sent to the emergency room when the catheter was not flushing, when the Foley was displaced, and when the catheter was malfunctioning and not in the appropriate place. Urology documented a 16 FR two-way Coude catheter placed with immediate urine return and noted significant ureteral erosion, recommending transition to a suprapubic catheter and placing a referral for interventional radiology. The urology record later showed unsuccessful attempts to contact the facility, then contact with nursing staff and the POA, who agreed the procedure was reasonable. Facility staff interviews showed uncertainty about the plan, with staff stating they were not sure whether the resident was supposed to get a suprapubic catheter, that the catheter was not secured because the snap secure was broken, and that the resident would need to go to the hospital if the catheter became dislodged. Resident #81 had a suprapubic catheter and was cognitively intact, with diagnoses including diabetes with neuropathy and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. The care plan included catheter irrigation and infection monitoring, and physician orders included daily flushing with normal saline. During observation, the resident’s room contained an open syringe, an open bottle of acetic acid, and a small unopened bottle of normal saline, even though the acetic acid order had been discontinued months earlier. A later observation again found an open syringe package in the room. Nursing staff verified that the discontinued acetic acid bottle should have been discarded and acknowledged the open syringe package, stating it would be used later and then backtracked when questioned about sterility. The resident stated he had repeatedly told nurses that a new syringe should be used for each flush, as instructed by urology.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 29, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.