Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0700
D

Failure to Attempt Alternatives and Assess Entrapment Risk Before Bed Rail Use

Barco, North Carolina Survey Completed on 12-04-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to attempt alternatives prior to the installation and use of bed rails and did not assess for risk of entrapment when completing assessments for one resident. The resident was admitted with a diagnosis of hypertension and was cognitively intact, independent with bed mobility and transfers, and had no recent falls or behavioral issues. Despite these factors, bilateral quarter bed rails were ordered and installed to promote bed mobility, with the stated goal of preventing decline in bed mobility. Documentation revealed that the resident had a physician's order for the bed rails and had given verbal consent after being informed of potential risks and benefits. However, there was no evidence in the assessment or care plan that any alternatives to bed rail use had been attempted or considered prior to installation. Additionally, the assessment did not include an evaluation for risk of entrapment associated with the use of bed rails. Interviews with facility staff, including the DON, Maintenance Director, Therapy Director, and Administrator, confirmed that no alternatives had been tried and that there was no documentation of such attempts. Staff also could not provide records of a therapy or nursing assessment supporting the need for bed rails or documenting failed alternatives. The Maintenance Director reported conducting safety inspections and checking for entrapment risk during installation, but this was not documented in the resident's assessment.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙