Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0880
D

Failure to Implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions During Feeding Tube Care

Morganton, North Carolina Survey Completed on 12-19-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Nurse #2 failed to follow the facility's infection control policy and procedures for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) during the administration of a nutritional supplement and water flushes through a feeding tube for Resident #45. The facility's policy, last revised on 6/13/24, required staff to wear a protective gown when providing high-contact care activities, including care involving a feeding tube for residents with an implanted medical device. During a continuous observation, an EBP sign was posted on the resident's door with instructions to wear a gown, and gowns were available in an over-the-door storage bin. Despite these measures, Nurse #2 did not wear a protective gown while performing the high-contact care activity. During interviews, Nurse #2 stated she believed the resident was no longer under any type of precautions and was unaware that EBP was still required at the time of care. The Staff Development Coordinator/Infection Preventionist and the Director of Nursing both confirmed that Nurse #2 should have worn a protective gown during the procedure. Resident #45 had a feeding tube, which is considered an implanted medical device, and was subject to EBP according to facility policy.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙