Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0627
D

Failure to Properly Identify Discharge Location During Immediate Discharge

Salisbury, Missouri Survey Completed on 12-31-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to follow proper immediate discharge procedures for a resident who exhibited increased aggressive behaviors, including multiple physical assaults on staff. After a series of incidents involving physical aggression, law enforcement intervention, and psychiatric evaluation, the resident was sent to a hospital. The facility then determined it could not meet the resident's needs and issued an immediate discharge notice while the resident was at the hospital. However, the discharge notice identified the psychiatric hospital as the discharge location, which did not meet regulatory requirements for specifying an appropriate discharge location. The facility's policy required that, in cases of emergency transfer and subsequent discharge, the discharge location must be properly identified and the resident's status must be evaluated based on their condition at the time of transfer. Despite this, the facility did not amend the immediate discharge notice to reflect an appropriate discharge location after being informed of the error. The discharge letter was also improperly dated, and there was no documentation explaining why the resident was taken into custody on one of the dates in question. The resident, who had a guardian, remained in the hospital pending a hearing after the discharge was appealed. The facility had attempted to find an alternative placement for the resident for several months but was unsuccessful due to the resident's aggressive behaviors. The failure to properly identify a discharge location and to amend the discharge notice as required constituted the deficiency cited in the report.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙