Infection Control Oversight and Antibiotic Stewardship Deficiencies
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the infection preventionist had appropriate oversight of the infection control program, including resident infection surveillance and antibiotic stewardship. Monthly infection summary reports from May 2025 through November 2025 included resident name, infection date, body system affected, symptom resolution date, infection, medication, source, and whether criteria were met, but the logs did not show whether the antibiotic met criteria for continued use. The infection preventionist acknowledged that the surveillance logs were not monitored consistently and that the logs contained discrepancies regarding the indication for antibiotic use. For one resident, the October 2025 infection log showed cefuroxime 250 mg by mouth twice daily for 5 days for UTI beginning 10/17/25, followed by cephalexin 500 mg by mouth twice daily for 7 days beginning 10/24/25 for UTI symptoms. Progress notes documented attempts to obtain urine, transfer to the hospital for evaluation, return with a UTI diagnosis, ongoing complaints of dizziness, chest fullness, inability to urinate, and family concern that the resident was not recovering well. The record lacked evidence from 10/18/25 through 10/21/25 and again from 10/25/25 through 10/28/25 of an assessment showing whether the antibiotic was effective. The hospital note later identified that the urine culture showed less than 10,000 colony-forming units per mL of mixed bacterial growth and that a true bladder infection was unlikely. For another resident, the August and September 2025 infection logs documented cephalexin 500 mg three times daily for UTI and later cefdinir 300 mg twice daily for 5 days for UTI, but the log lacked an end date for one antibiotic and did not show whether a urine culture was obtained. Progress notes showed the resident was sent to the hospital after a fall, returned with a UTI diagnosis and antibiotic orders, and later was readmitted with a fracture and new antibiotic orders. The progress notes on multiple days stated the resident had a UTI and was on antibiotics, but they lacked documentation of an assessment to determine whether the antibiotic was effective. Employee surveillance was also incomplete. The dietary absence report logs from May 2025 through November 2025 listed employee name, department, and illnesses reported, but did not accurately capture all necessary information. One employee illness log showed an employee left work with vomiting, and the timesheet showed the employee returned to work two days later, but the log did not state when or whether symptoms resolved before the employee returned. The interim administrator stated that evening nursing staff without IP training or certification were assigned to update and maintain resident surveillance infection logs monthly, that antibiotic timeout assessments were expected within 48 to 72 hours, and that pharmacy reminders were not consistently followed. The infection control program was discussed at QAPI meetings, but there was no discussion identifying improvement of staff illness tracking or expectations for when employees could return to work.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
Failure to designate a qualified IP for the IPCP. An interim nurse said she could not locate her IP certificate, had not really completed much of the IP duties, and was only enrolled in IP courses. Another admin staff member thought the interim nurse had a current IP certificate and expected the facility to have a designated certified IP. The facility did not provide an IP policy.
Infection Preventionist Lacked Required Specialized Training: The facility failed to ensure the RN serving as the IP had completed the required specialized education in infection prevention and control. Survey review found partial CDC training documentation, but the final test certificate had expired and there was no proof the test was taken and passed. The RN stated they were unsure whether a final test was completed and did not have a passing certificate, and the NHA said they had believed the IP course was completed.
The facility failed to maintain a qualified IP onsite to oversee the infection prevention and control program during two gaps in coverage. Facility records showed one IP was not yet qualified before completing the required education, and another IP had not yet completed the qualifying education after becoming DON, leaving periods when no qualified IP was designated.
Infection Preventionist Failed to Track and Trend Recurrent UTIs: The designated IP did not complete infection surveillance, track or trend infection data, or analyze recurring UTI patterns. The IP stated she mainly reviewed antibiotic orders and entered them into the monthly log, was unsure of infection criteria, and was behind on documentation. Logs showed multiple recurrent UTIs, including repeated E. coli cultures, but there was no documentation of analysis, source identification, or staff education related to the recurring infections.
The facility failed to have a qualified and trained Infection Preventionist for its infection prevention and control program. A staff list did not identify an IP, and the Administrator stated an RNCM was the designated IP, but there was no documentation showing completion of the required CDC Train modules or certification. The Administrator later confirmed there was no verification that the RNCM had completed the appropriate certification to serve in that role.
No qualified Infection Preventionist was designated to oversee the infection prevention and control program. The NHA said the prior IP had left and the DON and an LPN would work on the program, but the DON said they were not taking the role and the LPN could not provide proof of specialized IP training, stating the training was many years old and that they would take it in the upcoming days. The issue affected all 39 residents.
Failure to Designate a Qualified Infection Preventionist
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to designate a qualified Infection Preventionist (IP) who had completed specialized training in infection prevention and control to be responsible for the Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP). During interview, Administrative Nurse E, the interim nurse, stated she could not locate her IP certificate, said that when she accepted the interim position an IP certification was not mentioned, and reported that she had not really completed much of the IP duties at the facility. She also stated she was enrolled in courses for IP at the time. Later, she produced the antibiotic/infection control log binder. Record review showed a Completion for Nursing Home Infection Preventionist Training Course for Administrative Staff A, who stated she thought Administrative Nurse E had a current IP certificate and expected the facility to have a designated certified IP employed there. The facility did not provide a policy for an Infection Preventionist.
Infection Preventionist Lacked Required Specialized Training
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that RN G, who was acting as the Infection Preventionist, had completed the required specialized education in infection prevention and control. Survey review of the documentation provided for the Infection Preventionist's training found that some modules had certificates of completion from the CDC infection control program, but the CDC training log showed the certificate for the final IP test had expired, indicating the test was not taken within the allowed time after completing the modules. The required IP course did not show that the certification test was taken and passed. When interviewed, RN G stated they were not sure whether they had taken a final test after completing the training modules and did not have a certificate showing they passed the IP test. The Nursing Home Administrator stated they had thought RN G had completed the IP course and that the expectation was for the IP to meet the qualifications required by federal regulations.
Failure to Maintain a Qualified Infection Preventionist
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to designate a qualified infection preventionist (IP) onsite to be responsible for implementing the infection prevention and control program during two periods identified in the survey review: 11/12/25 through 11/24/25 and 4/26/26 through 5/20/26. The facility policy dated 4/30/26 stated that the IP coordinates the development and monitoring of the infection prevention and control program and is employed onsite at least part time. The facility’s IP timeline showed RN Employee E5 responsible from 5/1/24 through 11/12/25, IP Employee E19 responsible from 11/13/25 through 3/5/26, and IP Employee E18 responsible from 3/5/26 to present. However, E19’s certificate for the qualifying education required was dated 11/24/25, leaving a gap before qualification, and facility documentation showed E19 became the DON on 4/26/26. E18’s certificate for the qualifying education required was dated 5/20/26, leaving another gap before qualification. During interview on 6/8/26 at 2:00 p.m., the DON confirmed the two IP designation gaps.
Infection Preventionist Failed to Track and Trend Recurrent UTIs
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the designated Infection Preventionist (IP) implemented and monitored the Infection Prevention and Control Program by not conducting infection surveillance, tracking and trending infections, analyzing infection data, or identifying infection control concerns. The IP job description stated the IP was responsible for development, implementation, oversight, and evaluation of the program, but the IP reported she only reviewed physician orders for antibiotics and entered information into the monthly infection tracking log. She stated she did not review resident symptoms when monitoring infections, was unsure what infection criteria were used to identify infections, and had not completed the May 2026 infection control log, stating she was usually about one month behind in documentation. Record review of the urinary tracking infection logs from February 2026 through April 2026 identified 54 UTI episodes, excluding residents admitted with infections and duplicate entries for the same active infection, with multiple residents experiencing recurrent UTIs. The logs included resident names, organisms identified, antibiotic treatment, treatment completion dates, and follow-up culture results, but there was no documentation that the infections were analyzed for trends, contributing factors, recurring organisms, or opportunities for intervention. The logs also showed a recurring pattern of E. coli in urine cultures, yet there was no evidence of surveillance to identify contributing factors, determine the source, or implement corrective interventions. The IP confirmed she had not tracked or trended infections, evaluated recurring infection patterns, analyzed infection data, or provided staff education regarding perineal care, catheter care, hydration, or other interventions related to the recurring infections.
Qualified Infection Preventionist Not Documented
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to have a qualified and trained Infection Preventionist in place for the infection prevention and control program. A staff list provided on 6/1/26 did not identify an Infection Preventionist. On 6/2/26 at 9:30 AM, the Administrator stated that Staff 12, the RNCM, was the designated Infection Preventionist, but Staff 12 was out of the facility and could not be interviewed. Review of documents provided by the Administrator showed that Staff 12 had completed 11 of 24 modules of CDC Train training, with no indication that the modules were completed and no evidence of a completed certification. When additional information about completion of the training and certification was requested, none was provided. On 6/4/26 at 12:43 PM, the Administrator confirmed there was no documentation verifying that Staff 12 had completed the appropriate certification to serve as the designated qualified Infection Preventionist.
No Qualified Infection Preventionist Designated
Penalty
Summary
The facility did not ensure that one or more individuals were designated as the Infection Preventionist with specialized infection prevention and control training. The facility policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program, stated that the designated Infection Preventionist is responsible for oversight of the program and serves as a consultant to staff on infectious diseases, resident room placement, isolation precautions, staff and resident exposures, surveillance, and epidemiological investigations. During interviews, the NHA stated the previous Infection Preventionist had recently terminated and that the DON and an LPN would be working on the program together. The DON later stated they were not taking on the role of Infection Preventionist and that the LPN had recently started and would be assisting in the role. The LPN reported having completed training many years ago but could not obtain proof of completion, and later stated the certification was over 15 years old and that they would be taking the training in the upcoming days. The deficiency was identified for all 39 residents.
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 26, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.