Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0657
D

Failure to Update Care Plan with Individualized Fall Prevention Intervention

Golden Valley, Minnesota Survey Completed on 12-11-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to revise the care plan for a resident with multiple diagnoses, including Down syndrome, right shoulder dislocation, Alzheimer's, dementia, intellectual disabilities, and epilepsy, to include an individualized intervention—a fall mat—despite its use at the bedside. The resident was identified as a fall risk due to her medical conditions and history of a fall prior to admission. The care plan, developed after admission, included general fall prevention interventions such as following therapy instructions, monitoring safety, and reviewing past falls, but did not specify the use of a fall mat as an intervention. Observations confirmed that a fall mat was present by the resident's bed, and staff interviews revealed that the mat was used as a precaution because the resident was known to roll out of bed, although she had not fallen since admission. Multiple staff members, including a nursing assistant and registered nurses, acknowledged the presence and purpose of the fall mat but confirmed that it was not documented in the resident's care plan. The facility's care planning policy requires individualized, person-centered care plans developed by the interdisciplinary team, but this intervention was omitted from the written plan.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙