Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0610
D

Failure to Investigate Abuse Allegations for High-Risk Resident

Hutchinson, Minnesota Survey Completed on 12-10-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to conduct a formal investigation into multiple allegations of physical and sexual abuse made by a resident with mild cognitive impairment, chronic pain, and a history of behavioral disturbances, paranoia, and delusions. The resident, who required substantial assistance and used a wheelchair, reported on several occasions that he had been struck on the head and touched inappropriately. Documentation shows that staff were aware of the resident's history of making abuse allegations and had implemented a buddy care system as a preventive measure. Despite these safeguards and the resident's repeated reports, staff responses were limited to documentation and internal notifications, without initiating a formal investigation as outlined in facility policy. Interviews with nursing and administrative staff revealed that the decision not to formally investigate was based on the resident's history of making similar allegations, the presence of the buddy care system, and the belief that no other residents could have entered the room. The facility's Vulnerable Adult Abuse Prevention Plan required a review and formal investigation of each allegation, including completion of an Investigation Form and staff interviews. However, these steps were not taken in response to the resident's reports, and the interdisciplinary team determined that a formal investigation was unnecessary, contrary to facility policy.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙