Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
E

Failure to Develop Abuse Risk Care Plans for At-Risk Residents

Matteson, Illinois Survey Completed on 11-18-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to develop and implement person-centered care plans for four residents identified as at risk for abuse. Interviews with facility staff revealed confusion and lack of clarity regarding responsibility for initiating and updating abuse risk care plans. The social services director stated that social services is responsible for care plans related to behaviors, mood, and cognitive status, but not for abuse risk care plans, and was unaware of who should complete them. The interim DON indicated that nurses are responsible for nursing-related care plans and believed social services should initiate abuse risk care plans, while the social service assistant reported that abuse risk assessments are completed but not followed by specific abuse care plans, with documentation instead placed under other care plan categories. Record review showed that each of the four residents had completed abuse risk assessments indicating they were at risk for abuse or neglect and that care planning was required. The assessments cited reasons such as physical and mental dependence, impaired mobility, lack of safety awareness, non-verbal communication deficits, and cognitive fluctuations. Despite these findings and the explicit notation that care planning was required, none of the residents had an at risk for abuse care plan initiated in their medical records.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙