Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0658
D

Failure to Complete Neurological Checks After Multiple Unwitnessed Falls

Mystic, Connecticut Survey Completed on 08-06-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to follow its own policy regarding neurological checks after unwitnessed falls for a resident with significant risk factors, including a history of subdural hematoma, atrial fibrillation, and use of anticoagulation. The resident was identified as being at risk for falls due to confusion and disorientation, and the care plan included interventions for fall prevention. On the day in question, the resident experienced multiple unwitnessed falls, each requiring neurological assessments as per facility protocol. After the first unwitnessed fall, neurological checks were initiated and documented at the required intervals. However, following a second unwitnessed fall, the neurological checks were not restarted as required by facility policy. Instead, the checks continued at the previous schedule, resulting in missed assessments at the mandated half-hour intervals after the second fall. Staff interviews confirmed that the expectation was to initiate a new set of neurological checks after each unwitnessed fall, but this was not done after the second incident. Documentation review and staff interviews further revealed that the neurological assessment protocol was not consistently followed after subsequent falls. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the facility policy required neurological checks to be restarted after each unwitnessed fall, but this was not adhered to in this case. The medical record lacked evidence of the required frequency of neurological checks after the second fall, and staff were not aware that the protocol had not been followed as outlined in the facility's neurological assessment form.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙