Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0684
D

Failure to Complete and Document Neurological Monitoring After Unwitnessed Fall

Manchester, Connecticut Survey Completed on 11-19-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure timely and complete neurological monitoring following an unwitnessed fall involving a resident with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, cervicalgia, and bipolar disorder. The resident, who was cognitively intact and independently ambulatory, was found outside the facility after an apparent elopement attempt. Initial assessments documented that the resident denied head injury and pain, and neurological checks were performed prior to the resident's transfer to the hospital. Upon return from the hospital, documentation of required neurological monitoring was missing for several hours, and the monitoring schedule was not followed as per facility standards. Further review revealed that neurological assessments were not resumed or documented upon the resident's return, despite the expectation for hourly checks to continue. The nurse responsible stated that vital signs were taken and the resident refused neurological monitoring at one point, but this refusal was not documented. Additionally, the nurse did not recall completing or attempting the required neurological assessments at the scheduled times, and documentation inaccurately indicated the resident was still hospitalized during periods when the resident was present in the facility. The facility lacked a clear policy or procedure directing staff on when to conduct post-fall neurological monitoring, relying instead on electronic medical record prompts. The Director of Nursing confirmed that neurological monitoring should have resumed upon the resident's return and continued for 72 hours, but acknowledged that the facility did not have a written policy to guide staff. The deficiency was identified through clinical record review, facility documentation, and staff interviews, which confirmed the failure to complete and document neurological assessments as required.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙