Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0600
D

Failure to Protect Resident from Sexual Abuse by Another Resident

Corpus Christi, Texas Survey Completed on 11-26-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a resident was protected from sexual abuse by another resident during dinner service in the dining room. One resident, a male with a history of cerebral infarction and severe cognitive impairment (BIMS score of 1), was observed by the Social Services Director (SSD) to have another resident, a female with Alzheimer's disease and also severe cognitive impairment (BIMS score of 6), touching his genital area over his pants. The SSD noticed the incident after making eye contact with the male resident, who appeared surprised, and upon further observation, saw the female resident's hand moving on top of his genital area. The SSD immediately intervened and separated the two residents. Interviews with facility staff, including the SSD, DON, and ADM, revealed that none of them believed the contact constituted sexual abuse, citing the lack of intent for sexual gratification and the belief that both residents could consent to sexual activity. The SSD and DON both stated that the male resident could communicate his needs and emotions, and the psychiatric services social worker noted that he felt safe at the facility, though he became defensive when asked about the incident. The female resident did not recall the incident and denied any inappropriate behavior. The facility's policy defines sexual abuse as non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident. Despite this, staff did not recognize the incident as sexual abuse and did not identify it as such in their responses. The incident was reported to the administration, but the staff's interpretation of the event did not align with the facility's written policy regarding abuse and resident protection.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙