Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0610
D

Failure to Thoroughly Investigate Allegations of Abuse and Neglect

San Antonio, Texas Survey Completed on 11-20-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide evidence that all allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment were thoroughly investigated for two residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. In the first case, a family member alleged neglect after observing a resident in a soiled brief. The facility's investigation did not include a physical assessment of the resident due to her discharge status and only included resident and staff interviews from other units, not the unit where the resident resided. The administrator confirmed that residents on the relevant unit were not surveyed during the investigation, and the determination of safety was based on routine staff rounds rather than direct investigation of the specific unit involved. In the second case, a family member alleged that a resident had been physically assaulted, resulting in a facial injury. The investigation included a physical assessment of the resident, interviews with the resident and family, and review of video footage. However, the investigation did not include abuse or neglect surveys of residents in the memory care unit where the resident lived, as the administrator believed those residents could not participate due to cognitive decline. No physical assessments were performed in place of verbal surveys for these residents, and the administrator relied on staff interviews and routine rounds to determine safety. Facility policy required investigations to include observations of the alleged victim, monitoring of at-risk residents, and assessment of interactions between staff and residents. Despite this, the investigations for both residents did not include direct interviews or assessments of other residents in the same units as the alleged victims. Additionally, some resident interview questionnaires were provided after the survey exit, without documentation of room numbers, making it impossible for surveyors to verify their relevance to the cases.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙