Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0657
D

Failure to Update Care Plan for Fall Interventions

Mexia, Texas Survey Completed on 11-15-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to review and revise the person-centered care plan to reflect the current condition of a resident who was at risk for falls. Specifically, the care plan for a male resident with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes, essential hypertension, muscle weakness, and lack of coordination was not updated to include interventions for falls related to unsteadiness during transfers, despite these needs being identified. The care plan had last been revised for falls interventions over two years prior, and no updates were made to address the resident's current condition and need for staff assistance during transfers. Interviews with the DON and MDS Coordinator confirmed that it was the responsibility of the MDS Coordinator to update care plans with appropriate interventions so staff would know how to assist residents. However, the MDS Coordinator could not provide a reason for the lack of updates to the resident's care plan. The facility's policy required comprehensive, person-centered care plans with measurable objectives and targeted interventions, but this was not followed in the case of this resident.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙