Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0684
E

Failure to Monitor Behaviors of Resident on Sex Offender Registry

Richmond, Virginia Survey Completed on 10-22-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Facility staff failed to provide appropriate monitoring and care for a resident who was listed on the sex offender registry. The resident was admitted with multiple medical diagnoses, including ischemic cardiomyopathy, CHF, atrial fibrillation, and an LVAD, and was assessed as cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15. The care plan addressed behavioral issues related to refusal of cardiac care but did not include interventions specific to monitoring for sexual or inappropriate behaviors. During the survey, it was determined that although the facility had a policy requiring behavioral assessment and monitoring, there was no evidence that staff monitored or documented the resident's behaviors related to their status on the sex offender registry. Interviews with administrative and social work staff confirmed that while the facility previously admitted residents on the sex offender registry, there was no process in place for ongoing monitoring of such residents' behaviors. Staff acknowledged that behaviors should be monitored and documented, but no such monitoring was found in the resident's records. The facility's own policy required assessment and monitoring of behaviors, but this was not implemented for the resident in question.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙