Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0779
D

Failure to File Signed and Dated Diagnostic Report in Resident Record

Salt Lake City, Utah Survey Completed on 11-20-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency was identified when the facility failed to file a signed and dated report of a radiological diagnostic service in a resident's clinical record. The resident, who had a history of traumatic subdural hemorrhage with loss of consciousness, quadriplegia, spinal stenosis, and post-traumatic stress disorder, was admitted to the facility and later had a physician's order for an immediate (STAT) Kidney, Ureter, and Bladder (KUB) x-ray due to abdominal symptoms. Although nursing notes referenced the x-ray and its impression, the actual documentation of the x-ray results could not be located in the resident's medical record during the review period. Interviews with multiple staff members, including LPNs, the Regional Compliance Nurse, the DON, and the Administrator, revealed that the process for handling x-ray results involved receiving faxed reports from the x-ray company, notifying the physician, and distributing copies to various offices before forwarding the results to medical records for scanning and attachment to the resident's chart. However, there was a lack of clarity and consistency in the process, and the KUB x-ray result for the resident in question was not found in the clinical record as required.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙