Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0657
D

Failure to Update Care Plan for Side Rail Use

Chattanooga, Tennessee Survey Completed on 07-23-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to revise the care plan for one resident after a change in the use of side rails. According to the facility's own policies, care plans are to be updated as needed, including when side rails are used for safety or positioning. The resident in question was admitted with diagnoses of dysphagia, hypertension, and moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, and was assessed as cognitively intact. The comprehensive care plan documented the use of bilateral 1/4 upper side rails at the request of the resident's representative, with no mention of lower side rails being used. However, during multiple observations, the resident was found in bed with both upper and lower 1/4 side rails in the up position. Staff interviews confirmed that all four side rails were being used, and the resident himself confirmed his preference for this arrangement to aid in mobility. Despite this, the care plan was not updated to reflect the actual use and resident preference for four side rails, as confirmed by the DON and an LPN. This failure to revise the care plan as required constitutes the deficiency.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙