Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
D

Failure to Address Resident Romantic Relationships in Care Plans

Canonsburg, Pennsylvania Survey Completed on 09-12-2025

Penalty

Fine: $18,978
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive, person-centered care plans addressing the needs of residents involved in consensual romantic relationships. Specifically, for four residents with varying degrees of cognitive impairment and complex medical histories—including dementia, Alzheimer's, Parkinsonism, bipolar disorder, heart failure, and other conditions—there was no evidence in their care plans that their desire or involvement in romantic relationships with other residents was assessed or addressed. Documentation showed that while some guardians were informed and expressed no objection to the relationships, the care plans did not reflect any interventions, objectives, or timetables related to supporting or monitoring these relationships as part of the residents' psychosocial needs. Review of clinical records, progress notes, and staff interviews confirmed that the facility's interdisciplinary care planning team did not include the residents' romantic relationships in their care plans, despite clear evidence of such relationships and, in some cases, guardian awareness and approval. The deficiency was acknowledged by facility leadership, who confirmed that care plans for these residents did not address this aspect of their care, as required by facility policy and regulatory standards.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙