Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
D

Failure to Consistently Implement Fall Prevention Interventions

Jenks, Oklahoma Survey Completed on 09-03-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to implement fall prevention interventions as outlined in the care plans for two residents identified as being at risk for falls. For one resident, repeated observations over two days revealed that a fall mat, which was an intervention specified in the care plan following a previous unwitnessed fall resulting in fractures, was not present at the bedside. Staff interviews indicated that the resident was on hospice and unable to move independently, but the care plan still included the use of a fall mat as a preventive measure. The care plan also listed other interventions such as keeping the call light within reach, using positioning bars, and frequent checks, but the absence of the fall mat was consistently noted during multiple observations. For another resident, who was assessed as a high fall risk with severely impaired cognition, the fall mat was observed to be under the bed rather than positioned at the bedside as intended. This resident had a recent history of a fall resulting in a head laceration and abrasions, despite the fall mat being in place at the time. Staff interviews revealed some uncertainty about the exact placement of the fall mat and the circumstances of the fall, with one CNA stating they did not know why the fall mat was not present at the bedside during one observation. The care plan for this resident included multiple interventions such as a concave mattress, fall mat at bedside, and keeping the bed in the lowest position, but the implementation of these interventions was inconsistent. The deficiencies were identified through direct observation, record review, and staff interviews, which demonstrated that the facility did not consistently ensure that fall prevention interventions were in place as specified in the residents' care plans. Both residents had documented histories of falls and were assessed as high risk, yet the required safety measures were not reliably implemented, leading to a failure to provide adequate supervision and prevent accident hazards.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙