Delayed UTI Treatment and Nonfunctioning Suprapubic Catheter
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a resident’s urinary tract infection was timely and appropriately treated. Resident #69 had diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus, depression, schizoaffective disorder, peripheral vascular disease, and hypertension, and was occasionally incontinent of bowel and bladder with substantial to maximal staff assistance needed for toileting. A physician order on 07/22/25 directed staff to obtain a urinalysis with culture if indicated for dysuria, collect the urine, place it in the laboratory refrigerator, and follow up with results in three days. On 07/24/25, nursing documented that a urine specimen could not be collected because the resident could not produce enough urine, but there was no documentation of further attempts to obtain the specimen from 07/24/25 through 07/29/25 and no documentation that the resident was monitored for continued or worsening signs of infection. On 07/30/25, nursing documented that a urinalysis was ordered and a clean-catch specimen was placed in the refrigerator. The laboratory report showed the specimen was collected on 07/30/25, received on 07/31/25, and the facility was notified on 08/02/25 that the culture grew greater than 100,000 Klebsiella pneumoniae. The organism was resistant to nitrofurantoin (Macrobid) and susceptible to multiple other antibiotics, including ciprofloxacin. The physician was not notified of the results until 08/04/25, and the resident reported ongoing weakness, burning, lethargy, dysuria, and lower back pain without having received an antibiotic. Nursing notes showed no follow-up with the physician or resident until after surveyor intervention, and Macrobid was later ordered despite the culture showing resistance to that medication. The facility also failed to ensure a suprapubic catheter was patent and functioning properly for Resident #81, who had diagnoses including unspecified dementia, retention of urine, and diabetes insipidus. The resident’s care plan identified an indwelling suprapubic catheter and directed staff to assist with toileting and provide catheter care per physician orders, with monitoring for pain, discomfort, and abnormalities. Physician orders required a suprapubic catheter to straight drain and catheter care every shift. During observation, the resident was seen ambulating from the bathroom with his pants off and urinating on the floor from his penis while the suprapubic catheter leg bag was empty. The resident stated he had reported the catheter was not working, but the nurse said there was nothing that could be done. An LPN stated she was unaware the catheter was not functioning and did not know the resident had a suprapubic catheter. The ADON later stated the catheter should have been monitored and that the resident had pulled on it while dressing, and a new suprapubic catheter was placed because the prior one was not draining properly.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 29, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.