Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
D

Failure to Develop and Implement Fall Risk Care Plans

Wilmington, North Carolina Survey Completed on 11-17-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to develop and implement person-centered care plans addressing fall risk for two residents who had documented histories of falls and related diagnoses. For the first resident, who was cognitively intact and had a left knee fracture, the Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment triggered the need for a fall risk care plan, but none was created. This resident experienced multiple falls during their stay, as documented in nursing progress notes and event reports, yet the care plan was not updated to address fall risk. The MDS Nurse confirmed that the care area assessment for falls was triggered and acknowledged that a fall risk care plan should have been initiated but was missed. The MDS Nurse also did not attend weekly interdisciplinary team (IDT) meetings where care plans were to be reviewed and updated, and the Interim Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that the care plan should have been updated during these meetings. Similarly, the second resident, who had severe cognitive impairment and a history of falls, also did not have a fall risk care plan in place despite the MDS assessment triggering the need for one. This resident experienced several falls during their stay, as documented in nursing progress notes. The MDS Nurse again confirmed that the fall risk care plan was not developed as required and stated it was missed. The Interim DON reiterated that the care plan should have been updated during weekly IDT meetings, but the MDS Nurse's absence from these meetings contributed to the deficiency. The Administrator confirmed that the MDS Nurse was responsible for developing the fall risk care plans for both residents.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙