Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0756
D

Missing Monthly Medication Regimen Review Documentation

Goldsboro, North Carolina Survey Completed on 12-17-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to have documentation of a monthly medication regimen review (MRR) by a licensed pharmacist for one resident. The resident, who had a history of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, stroke, peripheral vascular disease, chronic kidney disease, depression, and insomnia, was readmitted to the facility and did not have an MRR available for the month of October 2025. During the survey, staff and pharmacist interviews confirmed that the required documentation for the MRR could not be located for this resident. Pharmacist #1 reported that Pharmacist #2, who was responsible for the review, claimed to have paper notes for the October MRR, but these could not be found. The DON stated that she typically received monthly MRRs and recommendations from the pharmacist, with residents not requiring recommendations listed generally and specific recommendations documented separately. However, the resident in question was not included in the October MRR list provided to the DON. The administrator also confirmed that the MRR should have been completed in a timely manner by the pharmacy representative.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙