Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
D

Failure to Implement Fall Mat Intervention for Cognitively Impaired Resident

Greensboro, North Carolina Survey Completed on 09-13-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to implement a care plan intervention for a resident with dementia and hypertension, who was assessed as severely cognitively impaired and dependent on staff for bed mobility. The resident's care plan, last revised on 7/9/25, included the use of a fall mat on the left side of the bed as a fall precaution. However, during multiple observations on 9/8/25 and 9/10/25, the fall mat was not in place as directed by the care plan; instead, it was found rolled up in the bathroom. The resident was observed positioned in the center of the bed, with the bed in the low position, and was reported by her representative and staff to be able to roll in bed. Interviews with the unit manager and nursing assistants revealed a lack of awareness regarding the fall mat intervention. The unit manager was unaware that the fall mat was not in place and could not explain why it had been removed. One nursing assistant was not aware that a fall mat was required, while another, who provided care almost daily, had not seen the fall mat in use and reported that the resident had attempted to get out of bed in recent months. The DON also confirmed he was not aware the fall mat was not in place and stated it should have been on the floor as per the care plan.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙