Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0561
D

Resident Choice Not Honored in Assignment of Care Provider

Brewster, New York Survey Completed on 09-29-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when a resident's right to choose their health care provider was not honored. The resident, who had diagnoses including dementia, anxiety, and major depressive disorder, was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living and had severely impaired cognition. The resident's representative had formally requested that a specific Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) not be assigned to provide care for the resident. Despite this request, the CNA continued to provide care to the resident, as observed by the resident's son. Interviews with facility staff confirmed that the request was communicated to the appropriate personnel, including the Director of Nursing, Staffing Coordinator, floor nurses, and the CNA in question. However, the CNA was still assigned to and provided care for the resident after the request was made. Staff members interviewed were unable to explain why the CNA continued to provide care despite the documented preference and communication, indicating a failure in the facility's process to ensure resident choice regarding care providers.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙