Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
D

Failure to Individualize Care Plan for Resident Refusals and Preferences

Cape May Court House, New Jersey Survey Completed on 10-30-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to develop and implement an individualized comprehensive care plan (ICCP) for a resident who was non-compliant with receiving ordered treatments and meals prepared by the facility. The resident had significant medical conditions, including a stage 4 pressure ulcer, malignant neoplasm of the rectum, and a right fibula fracture, and was assessed as having moderately impaired cognition. Despite documented refusals of wound care treatments and prescribed medications on multiple occasions, as well as repeated refusals of facility-prepared meals in favor of home-cooked food, the care plan did not address these refusals or the resident's preferences. Documentation in the medical record, treatment administration record, and nursing progress notes confirmed the resident's pattern of refusing both treatments and meals. The resident's spouse also communicated the resident's preference for home-cooked meals to nursing staff. However, the comprehensive care plan lacked any focus or interventions related to the resident's refusals or meal preferences, contrary to the facility's own policy requiring incorporation of personal and cultural preferences and documentation of services not provided due to resident choice.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙