Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0628
E

Failure to Reassess and Coordinate Discharge for Hospitalized Residents

Kansas City, Missouri Survey Completed on 07-31-2025

Penalty

Fine: $19,115
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to adhere to all required components of the discharge process for three residents who were found to be medically stable and no longer a safety risk after being transferred to the hospital. Documentation and interviews revealed that, although immediate discharge notices were provided to guardians and the ombudsman, the facility did not reassess the residents' conditions after hospitalization to determine if their needs could be met upon return. The facility also did not collaborate with guardians or hospital staff to facilitate the residents' return or alternative placement, despite requests and appeals from guardians and hospital case managers. For each of the three residents, the facility issued immediate discharge notices citing health and safety concerns, and transferred the residents to the hospital. The discharge letters included required information such as the reason for discharge, appeal rights, and ombudsman contact details. However, after the residents were stabilized in the hospital and deemed ready for return, the facility refused to reassess or accept them back, and did not engage in further communication or planning with the hospital or guardians regarding their return or alternative placement. Guardians and hospital staff reported a lack of follow-up and communication from the facility, and appeals were filed in response to the discharges. The residents involved had significant psychiatric and medical histories, including diagnoses such as vascular dementia, paranoid schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and Wernicke's encephalopathy. Despite being medically cleared for return by hospital staff, the facility maintained its decision not to readmit the residents, and did not provide evidence of reassessment or efforts to ensure safe and appropriate discharge planning. The ombudsman confirmed receipt of discharge notices and ongoing appeals, with all three residents remaining in the hospital awaiting further placement.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙