Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
D

Failure to Consistently Implement Fall Prevention Interventions

Stevensville, Michigan Survey Completed on 10-01-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to implement care plan interventions and follow facility policy to prevent falls for a resident with dementia, confusion, incontinence, reduced mobility, and end-stage Alzheimer's disease. The resident was identified as a fall risk, and the care plan included interventions such as keeping the bed in a low position, placing a fall mattress next to the bed, and conducting regular visual checks. Despite these interventions being documented, staff did not consistently ensure the fall mattress was properly positioned next to the bed as required. On one occasion, a CNA observed the resident attempting to get out of bed and sliding to the floor, after which additional fall prevention measures were added, including placing one side of the bed against the wall and using a full-thickness mattress on the open side. However, during a later observation, the fall mattress was found standing on its side rather than lying flat on the floor next to the bed. Staff interviews revealed that the CNA forgot to lay the mattress down after removing the resident's roommate, and the LPN assumed the CNA would do it, resulting in the intervention not being in place as intended. The facility's policy required that interventions to prevent falls be implemented and care plans updated as needed. Despite the resident's high risk for falls and the documented need for a fall mattress, staff failed to consistently follow the care plan and policy, leaving the resident without the required fall protection at the bedside. This lapse in following established interventions and policy contributed to the deficiency cited by surveyors.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙