Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0684
D

Failure to Perform and Document Physician-Ordered Urinary Retention Monitoring

Shrewsbury, Massachusetts Survey Completed on 11-04-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when a resident with a history of urinary retention and diagnoses of obstructive and reflux uropathy did not receive a physician-ordered treatment for monitoring and managing urinary retention. The resident had an order for post void residual (PVR) bladder scans every shift, with instructions for straight catheterization if the residual exceeded 500 ml. On one night shift, there was no documentation in the medical record or Medication Administration Record (MAR) to indicate that the PVR was performed, nor was the amount of urine retained recorded, as required by the physician's order and facility policy. Interviews revealed that the nurse preceptor on duty was supervising a new graduate nurse on orientation. The preceptor was unaware if the PVR was completed and acknowledged that if it had been done, it would have been documented accordingly. The Staff Development Coordinator confirmed that the preceptor was responsible for ensuring all treatments and documentation were completed as ordered. The Director of Nurses also stated that proper documentation would have been present if the PVR had been performed. The lack of documentation and uncertainty about whether the ordered treatment was provided constituted a failure to meet professional standards of practice.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙