Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0610
D

Failure to Thoroughly Investigate Allegations of Abuse and Neglect

Hagerstown, Maryland Survey Completed on 10-21-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse and neglect involving two residents. In the first case, a resident with Alzheimer's disease, depressive disorder, and a femur fracture alleged that a GNA was rough during care, causing bleeding. Although the resident initially refused assessment, a later skin check showed no injury. The facility's internal investigation included interviews with some staff and residents, but did not document whether staff were asked about prior observations of rough or unprofessional behavior by the GNA, nor whether other residents felt unsafe or had experienced similar issues. The investigation was concluded as unsubstantiated without fully determining if other residents were at risk. In the second case, following an allegation of neglect by another resident against a staff member, the facility suspended the alleged perpetrator and interviewed some residents on the staff member's assignment who could communicate. However, the investigation did not include head-to-toe assessments of non-verbal residents who had also been under the care of the alleged perpetrator. The DON acknowledged that these residents, who could not speak for themselves, were not assessed as part of the investigation, resulting in an incomplete review of the potential neglect incident.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙