Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0677
D

Failure to Provide Consistent Bathing Assistance to Residents

Great Bend, Kansas Survey Completed on 07-29-2025

Penalty

Fine: $26,685
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide consistent bathing services to two residents who required assistance with activities of daily living, specifically bathing. One resident with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, hypertension, anxiety, and depression, and who had intact cognition but required supervision with bathing, did not receive a bath or shower for multiple extended periods as documented in the facility's records. Although some refusals were recorded in the electronic medical record, there were numerous days with no documentation of bathing or refusal, and observations noted the resident with uncombed hair and unresponsiveness to questions. Another resident, diagnosed with a displaced femur fracture, Alzheimer's disease, hypertension, and diabetes, and who required partial to substantial staff assistance for bathing, also experienced significant gaps in receiving showers. Facility records showed long intervals without showers, with only a few refusals documented. Observations found this resident with greasy, uncombed hair, unshaven, and wearing soiled socks, and the resident was unable to recall if staff offered different bathing choices. Interviews with staff indicated that when residents refused bathing, alternative days or times were offered, and refusals were documented and reported to nursing staff. The facility's policy required staff to observe residents' skin condition, notify supervisors of refusals, and report according to policy and professional standards. Despite these procedures, the documentation and observations revealed that the facility did not consistently ensure that residents received the necessary assistance with bathing, as required by their care plans and facility policy.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙