Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0725
E

Delayed Call Light Response Due to Insufficient Nursing Staff

Carroll, Iowa Survey Completed on 10-15-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide adequate nursing staff to ensure timely response to resident call lights, as evidenced by multiple resident interviews and review of call light response logs. Several residents, all with varying degrees of cognitive function and complex medical histories including heart failure, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, morbid obesity, arthritis, hip fracture, and mental health disorders, reported that call lights often took longer than 15 minutes to be answered, particularly during evenings, weekends, and morning shifts. These delays were corroborated by facility documentation showing response times ranging from 16 to 39 minutes on multiple occasions. The Director of Nursing acknowledged that call light response times were an ongoing issue and provided logs confirming extended delays. Additionally, the DON stated that the facility did not have a formal call light policy and instead relied on general standards of care. The expectation communicated by the DON was for call lights to be answered within 15 minutes, but this standard was not consistently met, as shown by both resident reports and facility records.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙