Delayed UTI Evaluation and Failure to Communicate Catheter-Related Lab Results
Summary
The facility failed to notify the physician of changes in a resident’s condition, failed to intervene in a timely manner by collecting a urinalysis specimen for immediate processing, and failed to communicate laboratory results that indicated treatment was required to the resident’s physician after discharge for a resident with a urinary catheter. The resident had diagnoses including neurogenic bladder, paraplegia, a stage IV pressure ulcer of the left buttocks, osteomyelitis, anxiety, and depression, and had intact cognition with a BIMS score of 15 out of 15. The resident used a urinary catheter and required moderate staff assistance with transfers, bathing, and toileting. The resident’s record showed a physician order on 10/17/25 for a UA with C&S to be done Monday early AM and sent to the lab Monday AM. Nursing notes documented cloudy urine and mucus on 10/12/25 and 10/16/25, then foul smell, mucus, hematuria, cloudy appearance, and urine retention on 10/18/25, with the catheter intact. The UA specimen was not obtained until 10/20/25 at 12:04 a.m., when it was placed in a cooler on ice for lab pickup. The resident stated she had been telling staff for about 2 weeks before discharge that she thought she had a UTI, that staff knew she was having symptoms and did nothing until the day before discharge, and that when she spoke to Staff A on 10/17/25 she was told they would deal with it on Monday. The final UA results from 10/20/25 showed turbid urine, blood, positive nitrites, 3+ leukocytes, greater than 50 WBCs, moderate bacteria, mucus, budding yeast, and WBC clumps. The culture grew more than 100,000 CFU Klebsiella pneumoniae and 20,000 to 25,000 CFU Enterococcus faecalis, indicating a UTI requiring treatment with at least 2 different antibiotics. The resident stated that on 10/24/25 she felt very ill with fever of 101, rapid heart rate, flank pain, and thick foul-smelling urine with mucus, and that her urologist prescribed an antibiotic based on her symptoms on 10/25/25. She also stated she had not received the results of the UA done on 10/20/25. Staff interviews showed confusion about why the specimen was delayed, that the order was entered as a provider-written order without provider authorization, and that the facility’s ARNP denied being informed of the resident’s UTI symptoms or authorizing the order as described.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 29, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.