Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0806
D

Failure to Accommodate Resident Food Allergies and Preferences

Idaho Falls, Idaho Survey Completed on 09-15-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that meals were prepared in accordance with residents' documented allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as required by its own nutrition policy. One resident with a documented allergy to tomatoes and melon was served chicken with a red, tomato-based sauce, which the resident could not eat due to his allergy. The resident's medical record and printed meal ticket both indicated these allergies, yet the meal was still provided. The food service manager confirmed, after investigation, that the resident had indeed been served a meal containing a tomato-based sauce, contrary to his dietary restrictions. This deficiency was identified through observation, policy review, and interviews with the resident and staff, and it had the potential to affect all residents with special dietary needs who dined in the facility.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙