Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0757
D

Failure to Follow Medication Parameters for Antihypertensive Administration

Gainesville, Florida Survey Completed on 10-10-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that physician-ordered parameters for antihypertensive medication administration were followed for a resident with multiple complex medical conditions, including hypertension, respiratory failure, and hypercalcemia. The physician's order specified that Metoprolol should be held if the resident's systolic blood pressure (SBP) was less than 110 or heart rate (HR) was less than 70. Despite these clear parameters, medication administration records showed that Metoprolol was given on multiple occasions when the resident's SBP was below the ordered threshold, with documented readings as low as 80/48. Interviews with several LPNs revealed uncertainty or lack of recall regarding adherence to the medication parameters, and some staff indicated they would have held the medication if aware of low blood pressure or the specific parameters. The DON and prescribing providers confirmed that medications should not be administered outside of ordered parameters and that they were not notified of these occurrences. Facility policy required medications to be administered as prescribed, including adherence to any parameters, but this was not followed in the resident's case.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙